Thursday, March 15, 2007

Slave our souls

I år firas på flera håll 200-års jubileet av slaveriets "avskaffande", ett begrepp inom citationstecken, med tanke på den i The Guardian berättigat ställda frågan
what, precisely, is it that we are all marking? Ministers and other public figures, along with newspapers (including the Guardian, sadly), have referred to 2007 as the bicentenary of the abolition of slavery. That is not so. Even to say that the slave trade (that is the trafficking in human beings as distinct from "slavery", which is the condition of being enslaved) was ended in 1807 is not strictly true: the act did not come into effect until 1808 and "the abominable traffick" was continued by Europeans and North Americans for decades afterwards. So, to be precise: 200 years ago the British parliament passed a bill to end trading in enslaved Africans using British ships. Before slavery was finally stamped out, somewhere between 10 million and 30 million Africans had been traded, transported or killed by Europeans in the Caribbean and the Americas.
Och vad är det egentligen vi ska få ut av att förhålla oss till detta historiska fenomen? Hur ska vi bete oss?
Some white people are hooked on guilt, and others are seeking to appropriate the bicentenary to promote the image of a benevolent Britain ridding the world of slavery. Some black people, meanwhile, are locked into seeing themselves in a state of victimhood. I am sure few people really enjoy these feelings, although they can masquerade as a source of comfort...
I LA Times, läggs ett iperspektiv på det hela som vore nästan otänkbar i den självmedvetet genomsekulariserade svenska debatten:
In our post-9/11 era, there's suspicion and antagonism toward religious belief, especially when it mixes with politics. Secularists such as Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris describe the beliefs of the faithful as a "delusion" and akin to "insanity." Wilberforce endured similar scorn. He was lampooned for his "damnable doctrine" and dismissed as a "treacherous fanatic."

Modern skeptics should remember that the great campaign against the international slave trade was not led by atheists. It was fought by people with deep Christian convictions about the dignity and freedom of every person made in the image of God.

This year, Britain is honoring Wilberforce's legacy with lectures and conferences. In the United States, the biographical film "Amazing Grace" opens in theaters Friday. Some will chafe at all the attention. Yet we face our own assaults on human rights — including the sexual trafficking of women and girls, genocidal violence in Sudan and the prison camps of North Korea.

Surely we need more of Wilberforce's brand of faith today, not less.
Det kan väl inte vara en felaktig slutsats?

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Nej, det är ingen felaktig slutsats!
Brott mot mänskliga rättigheter vare sig de sker nu eller för hundra år sedan bör undersökas och blottläggas, oavsett om de skedde på Guadalope för två hundra år sedan eller idag på Guantanamo. Sedan kan jag ju tycka att det är rätt harmlöst att fira 200-årsdagen av lagstiftningen mot slaveri i det brittiska parlamentet. Det sätter ju i allafall sökarljuset på något som pågått i historien och än idag i något andra skepnader. Och det kan väl inte vara fel?